Nein
apalike.bst hat geschrieben:% This style should be used with the `apalike' LaTeX style (apalike.sty).
% \cite's come out like "(Jones, 1986)" in the text but there are no labels
% in the bibliography, and something like "(1986)" comes out immediately
% after the author. Author (and editor) names appear as last name, comma,
% initials. A `year' field is required for every entry, and so is either
% an author (or in some cases, an editor) field or a key field.
%
% Editorial note:
% Many journals require a style like `apalike', but I strongly, strongly,
% strongly recommend that you not use it if you have a choice---use something
% like `plain' instead. Mary-Claire van Leunen (A Handbook for Scholars,
% Knopf, 1979) argues convincingly that a style like `plain' encourages better
% writing than one like `apalike'. Furthermore the strongest arguments for
% using an author-date style like `apalike'---that it's "the most practical"
% (The Chicago Manual of Style, University of Chicago Press, thirteenth
% edition, 1982, pages 400--401)---fall flat on their face with the new
% computer-typesetting technology. For instance page 401 anachronistically
% states "The chief disadvantage of [a style like `plain'] is that additions
% or deletions cannot be made after the manuscript is typed without changing
% numbers in both text references and list." LaTeX sidesteps the disadvantage.
\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage{apalike}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@book{petera,
author={peter parker},
year={2014},
title={sugar and spice and everything nice},
}
@book{peterb,
author={peter parker},
year={2014},
title={no fancy title},
}
@book{peterc,
author={Jack parker},
year={2014},
title={very fancy title},
}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{document}
\cite{peterc,companion,aksin,aristotle:physics}
\cite{petera,peterb}
\bibliography{biblatex-examples,\jobname}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
\end{document}
