von Alex210586 » Di 15. Jan 2013, 21:49
@TechReport{RePEc:boc:bocoec:598,
author={Christopher F. Baum},
title={Stata: The language of choice for time series analysis?},
year=2004,
month=Jul,
institution={Boston College Department of Economics},
type={Boston College Working Papers in Economics},
url={http://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/598.html},
number={598},
abstract={This paper discusses the use of Stata for the analysis of time series and panel data. The evolution of time-series capabilities in Stata is reviewed. Facilities for data management, graphics, and econometric analysis from both official Stata and the user community are discussed. A new routine to provide moving-window regression estimatesrollregis described, and its use illustrated.},
keywords={econometrics; Stata; time series; panel data; graphics}
}
Ich hab den Verursacher gefunden! Durch diesen Bibtex-Eintrag geht die Liste der zitierfähigen Artikel NUR bis zu DIESEM Eintrag und nicht weiter. Irgendwo dadrin müsste also der Fehler sein, aber was könnte daran falsch sein? Hab es wie gewohnt von meiner Standardquelle kopiert (Ideas.repec.org)
[code]
@TechReport{RePEc:boc:bocoec:598,
author={Christopher F. Baum},
title={Stata: The language of choice for time series analysis?},
year=2004,
month=Jul,
institution={Boston College Department of Economics},
type={Boston College Working Papers in Economics},
url={http://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/598.html},
number={598},
abstract={This paper discusses the use of Stata for the analysis of time series and panel data. The evolution of time-series capabilities in Stata is reviewed. Facilities for data management, graphics, and econometric analysis from both official Stata and the user community are discussed. A new routine to provide moving-window regression estimatesrollregis described, and its use illustrated.},
keywords={econometrics; Stata; time series; panel data; graphics}
}
[/code]
Ich hab den Verursacher gefunden! Durch diesen Bibtex-Eintrag geht die Liste der zitierfähigen Artikel NUR bis zu DIESEM Eintrag und nicht weiter. Irgendwo dadrin müsste also der Fehler sein, aber was könnte daran falsch sein? Hab es wie gewohnt von meiner Standardquelle kopiert (Ideas.repec.org)