ich habe mich jetzt auch mal hier angemeldet, obwohl mir schon viele Beiträge geholfen haben
Ich hoffe jemand kann mir helfen, im Optimalfall ist es einfach ein dummer Fehler meinerseits..Folgendes Problem: Mein Latex (MiKTeX 2.9.6500 64bit) führt keine Silbentrennung mehr durch. Unten seht ihr die Einleitung meiner Arbeit in einem Minimalbeispiel und angehängt ein pdf, wie es bei mir kompiliert wird. Woran könnts liegen, der gleiche Header hat, soweit ich mich erinnere bis vor kurzem noch funktioniert.
Danke und viele Grüße!
Johannes
\documentclass[twoside,11pt,a4paper,bibliography=totoc]{scrbook}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{libertine} %Schriftart
\usepackage[amssymb,textstyle]{SIunits}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\begin{document}
\addchap{Introduction}
\label{chapeinleitung}
In December 2015, 195 member countries of the UN signed a declaration of intent that was called an historical event in the public. And -- in fact for the first time -- all of the world's governments except Syria and Nicaragua stated that they are:
\begin{quotation}
Recognizing the need for an effective and progressive response to the urgent threat of climate change on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge.
\label{quote:RecognClimateChange}
\end{quotation}
Consequently these nations agreed on adopting measures to achieve a limitation of the current temperature increase at ''well below $2\celsius$'' above the pre-industrial level. The agreement encourages all parties to strengthen their efforts in scientific and technological progress to fulfil that goal . That goal, however, seems to be very ambitious as a later start in reducing of the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions means, that the rate of needed reduction, that have to be undertaken, will be more demanding. Figure shows modelled surface temperature changes for different emission scenarios, that range from a net negative emission in the middle of the century (blue lines) to the worst-case scenario with emissions increasing to more than $100\giga\ton CO_2\per a$ and a corresponding temperature inrease of $3.2-5.4\celsius$ (red lines). The black line in figure gives an impression of the rate of reduction of CO$_2$ equivalent GHGs the global community has to accomplish to not exceed the \mbox{2-degree} goal at a $66\%$ likelyhood.
The emission pathways for individual nations or confederations following the intended national determined contributions (INDC) of the Paris agreement are shown in different colours. The emission pledges of the top-4 emitters leave no room for the rest of the world. This highlights once again how demanding the required GHG emission reductions are to stay below $2\celsius$.
As shown in , the ten most populous nations span a wide range of emissions per capita. Beginning with the USA with 17 tons CO$_2$ equivalent per capita and year, EU and China with about 7 and India with 2. The world average amounts to 5 tons CO$_2$ per capita and year. Considering the $2\celsius$ goal and a growing world population that world average soon has to be reduced, since the remaining quota of $CO_2$ emissions amounts to $816\giga\ton$ $CO_2$ and would be consumed within 25 years at the current emission rate $35\giga\ton\per a$. Therefore we have to find a compromise between equity in the ''right'' to emit GHGs and making it possible for less wealthy countries to develop on a lower level of GHG emissions.
Europe's role in that situation could be not only to reduce it's own emission amount below these 5 tons CO$_2$ per capita and year but also to act as a model for emerging countries how to handle the will for prosperity of the population and the need to deal with climate change. In that setting there is a need to have tools to check the impact of the taken measures for reducing GHG emission in Europe independently, a need for that in 2008 the Integrated Carbon Observation System Research Infrastructure (ICOS RI) was founded.
\end{document}
